Welcome to Gaia! :: View User's Journal | Gaia Journals

Really now....

Some times, someone who's ego is through the roof that they believe themselves to be superior and self righteous can really fall flat on their faces and make a fool of themselves...

Assumptions will get one nowhere. And for anyone to dare challenge me however indirectly on my spelling/grammar...now, spelling is one matter that I have no troubles admitting a foul on that aspect. But the full blown ignorance of some minds just can make most want to laugh and pull their hair out by the roots. My grammar and word structures is the most risky aspect to attack me on simply out because my structures are, for the majority of the time, sound and an underlying bitting when need be. There is no vanity calls in these statements as far as grammar/sentence structure goes because vanity and an awareness of your capabilities and standing firm on that are two drastically different things.

To point out that your belief that having a couple be in charge of an organization and voting against such a thing based off of that part mostly is fool hardy. Picking someone who has forced work that wasn't your own on you over someone who will keep the burdens light is beyond childishly naive. You make judgments based solely off of the records and the competency of the individual not by there personal relationships nor out of spite for those relations. It is evidence of a slightly unsounded mind to judge things irrationally otherwise. I have myself been guilty of brash judgments with an unsound mind based off of personal issues but as far as this isolated event goes, I have stood firm in what I believe are sound and safe judgments. I do not go off on a person's polices based off of any personal relations I have with them. The president of a club I am in at my school is a friend of mine. But I separate my personal thoughts from the "politics" and, from there, she wasn't doing much justice to the club. I wasn't the only one who brought a compliant like this to the table-it was a few friends who are officers and my boyfriend. To bluntly accuse only myself and my boyfriend of forcing a re-election whet it was painfully clear that nearly everyone was thinking this before we ever brought it is yet another facet to idiocy. So it shows the fool's hand. And even more so, to also vote because of that is even more to the landfill of inconsistency that was already there.

Granted, there could possibly be merit in having some issues with a couple in a president/vice president position. Yet again, it should all be based in the "political" arean not the "personal" area. If I had been going out with our recent president (who is a girl. Not that such an even would occur but just in the grossly hypothetical sense that it were so) the person implies a degree of similar actions. (that is to vote for the other who isn't involved in a "relationship-power-holding-scheme." Duly note that there is little validity in this argument/statement about the voting that had been done.

Second aspect-baseless attacks thereafter on my switch in sentence structure. The person scapegoated my boyfriend as a makeshift ploy against the way I was speaking in a middle to high brow manner. He had underhandedly insulted me on grammar/spelling so it was only courteous of me to correct myself, no? But that person just had to say such a thing in reference to my boyfriend as to say that two syllables (in words, perhaps? The statement and delivery was boringly childish) are the most he can comprehend. This was in retrospect also to the fact that though I had asked him politely for ideas, he worked around really answering it by blaming me for not hearing his ideas out in the past. Incorrectly defended, if I am not too vainly pointing out. There was a denial of what the real query was-I did not say anything about past mistakes that I was quick to point out that denial usually of ideas were accompanied in some form by queries as to who, what, when, where, why and how something was to be accomplished. He was mistaking me for our president, perhaps, but he himself was so disjointedly engaged in the discussion just minutes before that really, I wouldn't know where he could fathom such an idea.

My apologies, good sir, but do you might think that maybe you blind yourself so much more when you make yourself out to be the victim through physiological manipulation through a "pity me, mercy" attitude? Maybe perhaps it not to be as strong as that assumption and it is rather lighter than that accusation, but that is the general gist of things.

And must I waste energy and breath on such a "friend" of my beloveds? I have made my best efforts to rectify my (what I thought) to be baseless dislike. I do so, and for naught? To only be back stabbed in spite for my relationships? I am of the opinion now that I have been much too lenient in what I have felt towards my boyfriend's "friend". I should have, from the very start, been much more iron fisted in my feelings, but regrets are feelings that will only shame us more. Heavy handed sounds too strong, as it would sound for a death threat or a hurt wish, so it's rather I should have been much more critical of the Trojan Horse that stepped into my midst before turning around right when the belly explodes and the troops run out.

Perhaps I may add/edit this more when I don't feel so irked. But as it stands now, the issues and points addressed above were the ones so burned into my mind at the moment.